My IDSA Contact Us
IDSA NewsPrint-Friendly Newsletter
Forward to a Friend
Search Back Issues
Education & Training Resources Practice Guidelines Journals & Publications Policy & Advocacy Meetings About IDSA
March 2009
Vol. 19 No. 3
Practice Management
Medical Societies Raise Concerns About Medicare Audit Program

Medicare claims are getting extra scrutiny now that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is rolling out the Recovery Audit Contractor program (RAC).

RAC is a congressionally mandated program to identify improper Medicare payments and fight fraud, waste, and abuse. However, physician groups think it has failed to achieve its goal of eradicating frequent billing mistakes.

Beginning in March, RAC auditors are being phased in across the country.

IDSA was one of more than 100 state and national medical societies that sent a letter this month to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) arguing that the Recovery Audit Contractors (RAC) program is not an appropriate vehicle for reducing billing mistakes and improving payment accuracy. 

In their letter, the medical societies say that evaluation and management (E&M) codes are not appropriate for the program because the various levels of E&M services pertain to wide variations in skill, effort, time, responsibility, and medical knowledge—so much so that knowledgeable individuals often reach different conclusions about the level of service justified by the documentation.

The medical societies are also concerned about allowing contractors to perform audits on consultations, given physicians’ confusion over Medicare’s current policies on split-shared billing, transfer of care, and documentation for consultations.

Moreover, the letter says, auditing E&M services threatens to overburden physicians at a time when many specialties are in increasingly short supply and impending baby boomer retirements will exacerbate existing shortages.

The medical societies believe that physician outreach and education would be a better way to reducing billing and coding errors.

Encouragingly, a CMS official said at the IDSA Clinical Affairs Meeting this March that E&M claims with a one-level coding difference would not be challenged—at least for the first year or two of the RAC program.

If you are audited unfavorably, you are encouraged to appeal. For contact information for appeals and more information about the program, go to
How useful is this article?

< Previous Article | Next Article >

Post a comment

Your name:

Your comment:

Top Stories
New Influenza Guidelines Released
CDC Calls for Stepped-up Efforts against Carbapenem-resistant Bugs
Long-awaited FDA Guidance on CAP Drugs Released
IDSA Journal Club
Patient Care and Science
EIN: Better Testing for C. difficile
Drug Approvals, Recalls, Adverse Events Update
Practice Management
Medical Societies Raise Concerns About Medicare Audit Program
Global ID
New HIV/TB Figures Call for Increased Funding, ID Center Says
Policy and Advocacy
IDSA Responds to Supermarketsí Free Antibiotics Promotions
Forum Makes the Case for Medicare Coverage of Home Infusion Therapy
Deadline Extended for Public Input on Lyme Disease Guidelines
Your Colleagues
Welcome New IDSA Members!

IDSA | 1300 Wilson Blvd., Suite 300 | Arlington, VA 22209 | Phone: (703) 299-0200
To ensure delivery, please add '' to your email address book or Safe Sender List.
If you are still having problems receiving our communications,
see our white-listing page for more details.